Outsourcing Preparation
An independent, buyer-held read of readiness and the business case, taken before a vendor writes a single number, ending in a board-grade GO, FIX-FIRST, or NO-GO.
Buyer-held · before the deal is signed · nothing downstream to sell
The weakest side of the table is the buyer’s own
Preparation is where a major outsourcing or global capability center engagement is most often lost, on the buyer’s own side of the table. Agentic AI raises what is at stake. In the Akholi study of 150 Tier-1 financial-institution engagements, client preparation scored 3.52 of 10, the weakest of the five root-failure categories measured. It was the single worst-scoring category in 42 of those 150 engagements. The offering audits that preparation before a vendor writes a single number. It then hands back a prioritized plan to fix what is found.
- The weakest category is the buyer’s own. Client preparation is the weakest of the five root-failure categories, below vendor management, co-management, AI technology, and the third-party ecosystem. Roughly half of its ratings sit in distress. The three institutional categories, client preparation, vendor management, and co-management, together are the worst category named in 135 of 150 engagements. AI technology is the worst category in 5 of 150. The failure is institutional, not technical.
- Canceled engagements rated their preparation far lower. Canceled engagements rated their client preparation 2.35 of 10. Engagements still running rated it 4.26. Among engagements in the weakest third on preparation, 82% were canceled, 41 of 50. In the strongest third, 4% were canceled, 2 of 50. Across the study, preparation scores and outcomes move together.
- The failure lands early. More than half of all canceled engagements, 29 of 56, failed before a proof of concept ran. The canceled engagements were about five months old. Readiness gaps surface before value is ever demonstrated, not after.
- The business case is often the softest ground. Business-case, KPI, and ROI stability rated 3.48 of 10, with roughly half of ratings in distress. The numbers a vendor will later price against are frequently unstable at the start. A weak business case sets a weak baseline for everything measured after it.
The read in brief
The Readiness Read
The Readiness Read, phase by phase
Executive sponsor kickoff
The engagement opens with the executive sponsor. Akholi and the sponsor agree the scope, the components to be scored, and the owner who will answer for each. The sponsor sets the standard the institution will be held to. The read is framed as the buyer’s own instrument, run before any vendor engagement hardens.
The readiness audit
Akholi audits the five components of buyer preparation, each scored on the study’s scale. Data readiness: whether the data the agents will act on is available, governed, and fit for use. Process readiness: whether the processes to be handed over are documented, stable, and ready to automate. People and skills: whether the institution holds the roles and capability to run and supervise the work. Legacy estate: whether the systems the agents must touch can support them. Governance and responsiveness: whether decision rights, escalation, and the authority to stop a misbehaving agent are in place.
The business case and KPI audit
Akholi audits the business case as a separate line of work. The team tests the KPIs, the ROI definition, and the assumptions beneath them. The business-case score is one the study flags as weak. The audit establishes whether the numbers can bear the weight a vendor contract will place on them. Weak numbers are flagged before they anchor a price.
The prioritized remediation plan
Akholi returns a prioritized, sequenced plan. Each gap is ranked by its weight on the engagement’s odds. The plan names what to fix, in what order, and to what standard. It resolves to one of three doors: GO, ready to proceed; FIX-FIRST, proceed once named gaps close; NO-GO, do not sign on current readiness. The sponsor holds the plan and the decision.
The Readiness Read fits an institution where
- A major outsourcing or global capability center decision is on the table, not yet signed.
- The board carries non-delegable accountability for the outcome.
- The business case and the KPIs have not been independently tested.
- The sponsor wants readiness scored before a vendor frames the numbers.
- A FIX-FIRST or NO-GO read is worth more than a fast start.
The Practice
All offerings →Outsourcing Performance Tuning
A buyer-held read of a live, underperforming engagement across all five failure categories.
Crisis Response
An engagement in acute failure. A senior Akholi principal takes command within 24 hours.
The Practice
Independent reads and board-grade verdicts across the outsourcing and GCC lifecycle.

