The three remaining measures among the engagements not canceled: 94 active engagements
Indicator ANALYSIS:active_engagements · By Phil Hatch · Akholi · October 9, 2026
On this page
20 sectionsIndicator Specification
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Indicator code | None, a derived analysis |
| Question as asked | The three remaining measures among the engagements not canceled: 94 active engagements |
| Failure category | Not one of the 100 rated indicators |
| Place in the survey | Not a survey item |
| Indicator class | Derived from other indicators |
| Indicator type | Derived analysis |
| Response scale | Not applicable, a derived analysis |
| Answering base | As stated in Analysis Results |
| Non-answers | Not applicable |
Summary of Findings
The three remaining measures moved together on the 94 active engagements. Higher customer satisfaction came with a higher engagement indicator mean (r = 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.89). Customer satisfaction fell as intent to leave rose (r = −0.73, 95% CI −0.81 to −0.62). A higher engagement indicator mean came with lower intent to leave (r = −0.69, 95% CI −0.78 to −0.57). Cancellation likelihood, as respondents rated it, rose as customer satisfaction fell (r = −0.66, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.52). Of the 94 rated active engagements, 19 were at high and 39 at moderate cancellation likelihood.
Analysis Results
The figures in this section were computed for the study and placed by code from the statistics record.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Unit of analysis | Engagement |
| Active engagements | 94 |
Pairs of measures.
| Measures | n | r | R squared | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer satisfaction and engagement indicator mean | 94 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.77 to 0.89 |
| Customer satisfaction and intent to leave | 94 | −0.73 | 0.54 | −0.81 to −0.62 |
| Engagement indicator mean and intent to leave | 94 | −0.69 | 0.48 | −0.78 to −0.57 |
| Cancellation likelihood (C039) and customer satisfaction | 94 | −0.66 | 0.43 | −0.76 to −0.52 |
| Measures | t | df | p | TOST p | Equivalent to zero | Power at the observed effect | Smallest detectable r (MDE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer satisfaction and engagement indicator mean | 14.95 | 92 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | No | 1.00 | 0.29 |
| Customer satisfaction and intent to leave | −10.32 | 92 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | No | 1.00 | 0.29 |
| Engagement indicator mean and intent to leave | −9.13 | 92 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | No | 1.00 | 0.29 |
| Cancellation likelihood (C039) and customer satisfaction | −8.35 | 92 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | No | 1.00 | 0.29 |
Cancellation likelihood among active engagements (C039).
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Rule | a |
| Active engagements rated | 94 |
| High risk | 19 |
| Moderate risk | 39 |
| Low risk | 36 |
| Active engagements not rated | 0 |
| Canceled or at risk | 114 |
| Canceled or at risk, share | 76.00% of 150 |
Distribution of Recorded Values
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry the response distribution of each input.
Descriptive Statistics by Segment
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry the segment breakdown of each input.
Tests of Difference Between Segments
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry the tests across segments for each input.
Association with Cancellation Rate
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s association with this measure.
Association with Customer Satisfaction
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s association with this measure.
Association with the Engagement Indicator Mean
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s association with this measure.
Association with Intent to Leave
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s association with this measure.
Comparison of Associations Across the Four Measures
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s comparison across the four measures.
Clustering and Effective Sample Size
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry the clustering of each input.
Equivalence Tests of Null Results
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s equivalence test.
Robustness Checks
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s robustness checks.
Measure Independence and Part-Whole Correction
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s identity check.
Comparison with the Study Norm
This block is a derived analysis. Its own results are in Analysis Results. The blocks of its input indicators carry each input’s profile.
Interpretation of the Data
Canceled or at risk engagements numbered 114 in all (76.00% of 150). Customer satisfaction and the engagement indicator mean overlapped most among the active engagements (R squared 0.71).
Limitations
The evidence is reported experience: what the delivery team said about its own engagement, gathered in one cross-section. The figures showed associations, not causes. Indicators about the financial institution were reported at second hand by vendor staff. Cancellation is a descriptive contrast, because canceled engagements were rated after they ended.
Cancellation likelihood on active engagements came from respondents’ ratings on C039 under the rule printed in Analysis Results, so the at-risk count reflected what vendor staff expected rather than cancellations that occurred.
Definitions
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Indicator class | Derived from other indicators: computed by the study from other recorded fields, as Analysis Results sets out. |
| Failure category | One of the five failure categories of the Study Taxonomy, section 3. Only the 100 rated indicators carry one, and the indicator is not among them. |
| Direction | Each result is read in the direction of the measure it reports. |
| Engagement indicator mean | The mean of an engagement’s 100 indicator ratings. |
Sources and Provenance
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Study data | Study Data.xlsx, sha256 219eba0457274d04 |
| Statistics engine | compute_statistics.py, sha256 738319eef764602b |
| Statistics record | Computed Statistics.json, record ANALYSIS:active_engagements, sha256 e405f65a43e37a6e |
| Computed | October 8, 2026, 01:38 UTC |
| Template | Indicator Statistical Analysis Template, version 1.1 of 2026-10-06 |
| Figures placed by script | 72 of 72 |
