Akholi exists because the questions that matter most about work were being answered by people with something to sell.
For three decades the global outsourcing industry produced an enormous volume of analysis, almost all of it commissioned by parties with a position in the outcome.
Vendors published research proving vendors were right. Advisors published research proving advisors were needed. Governments published forecasts proving the policy they had already announced. Across eleven national skills forecasts we examined, ten predicted more jobs than materialised. A random process would have missed in both directions.
Akholi was founded on a narrow proposition: that the labor market is the most consequential structure in any economy, that it is poorly measured almost everywhere, and that someone should be answering questions about it without a book to talk. We take no vendor fees, no referral arrangements, and no engagement where the conclusion is specified in the brief.
The practical consequence is that we are small and intend to stay small. We publish our method alongside our findings, including the parts that weaken our own case. When the data does not support a claim, the claim does not appear, and we would rather return a fee than sign a report we cannot defend under questioning.
Our clients are governments deciding how to spend a generation of public money, institutions accountable for whether a program worked, and boards making location decisions that will outlast the executives making them. None of them is well served by being told what they want to hear.
We establish what is true before deciding what to argue. If the evidence dismantles our prior, we publish the dismantling. This is slower and it is the entire value of the firm.
Every series, vintage, and transformation is named. Anyone competent should be able to reproduce our number and disagree with it on the merits rather than the provenance.
No vendor relationships, no referral fees, no implementation arm waiting downstream. The only thing we sell is the analysis, which is why it can be trusted.
| Year | Milestone | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Founded | Established after three decades inside Fortune 500 workforce and delivery organisations, on the premise that the client side needed representation the market was not providing. |
| 2014 | First national engagement | Retained by a ministry of labor to build a workforce baseline from microdata rather than survey. The method became the template for every country diagnostic since. |
| 2019 | Institutional practice | Standing advisory relationships established with multilateral and donor institutions on program design, measurement, and independent evaluation. |
| 2024 | The research programme | A multi-year inventory of what is actually known about global labor delivery, built from primary sources. It underpins the annual report and the forthcoming book. |
| 2026 | Publishing openly | The annual report is released open access. The method travels with it, so the findings can be challenged by anyone willing to do the work. |